Li Tu vs Paul Jubb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tu vs P. Jubb

Li Tu
AUS
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
29
Age
26
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
258
C. Rank
384
160
Best Rank
180
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$384.8K
Career Money
$201.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Paul Jubb
GBR
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
29
Age
26
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
258
C. Rank
384
160
Best Rank
180
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$384.8K
Career Money
$201.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Tu 0 - 1 Jubb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Li Tu winning 0 and Paul Jubb winning 2. The last match between Paul Jubb and Li Tu was at the Busan Challenger, 09-04-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Jubb getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tu | 0 |
| Jubb | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Busan Challenger(04-09-24)
Paul Jubb
7
6
Li Tu
6
1
L. Tu vs P. Jubb H2H Profile
L. Tu vs P. Jubb Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li Tu has won 49.58% of points on their second serve, while Paul Jubb has won 44.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li Tu, in recent form, has won 47.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Jubb has won 47.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.18% and 27.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li Tu has saved 55.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Jubb has saved 55.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li Tu has won 44.19% of matches played (W/L 19/24), with Paul Jubb winning 58.33% (W/L 28/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 143/84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 20/17). Paul Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 57/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 22/19).
- Player level: In the last year, Li Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/14), where as Paul Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.00% of matches (W/L 21/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li Tu winning 0 times and Paul Jubb being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Li Tu winning 0 and Paul Jubb winning 2.
- The last match between Li Tu and Paul Jubb was at the Busan Challenger, 09-04-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Jubb getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:44.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li Tu has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.56 while Paul Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 381.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li Tu has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Jubb has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li Tu has converted 24.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Jubb has converted 37.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Li Tu vs Paul Jubb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tu vs P. Jubb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:30:44 | Average Match Time | 1:30:44 |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve % | 64% (45/70) |
| 56% (19/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (33/45) |
| 29% (7/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 39% (27/70) | Return Points Win % | 55% (32/58) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tu 50%, Jubb 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tu 50%, Jubb 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Tu 60%, Jubb 59%.
L. Tu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
P. Jubb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | ||
F | W | 7-6(4) 7-5 | ||
SF | W | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | ||

L. Tu vs P. Jubb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.59% (206/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.21% (246/120) |
| 58.77% (459/322) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.93% (546/308) |
| 53.27% (3945/3460) | Games Win/Loss | 55.04% (4497/3674) |
| 63.00% (143/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 71.20% (136/55) |
| 55.56% (25/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.15% (57/22) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.36% (31/24) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.66% (22/19) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1633 | Aces Total | 1157 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 714 | Total Double Faults | 1097 |
| 1:21:28 | Average Match Time | 1:37:22 |
| 369.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.81 |
| 61% (11980/19643) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14950/24035) |
| 73% (8735/11980) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10406/14950) |
| 52% (3991/7663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4758/9085) |
| 42% (799/1905) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1103/2648) |
| 39% (7882/20179) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10314/24969) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Main Tour W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 47.76% (64/70) | Challenger W/L | 52.80% (66/59) |
| 75.84% (113/36) | Futures W/L | 78.20% (165/46) |
| 61% (206/335) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (243/357) |
| 0% (0/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 54% (59/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (72/121) |
| 55% (51/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (67/119) |
| 88% (198/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (240/215) |
| 11% (198/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (240/24) |
| 22% (142/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (126/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 10:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 01:15 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
Top Predictions Today
13:10
H2H 0-0
14:30
H2H 0-0
16:30
H2H 0-0
18:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal